Dzhura S.G., ChursinovV.I., Yakimishina V.V. Creativity philosophy in the consciousness impersonal theory
Научный журнал «Вестник науки»

Режим работы с 09:00 по 23:00

Информационное письмо

  1. Главная
  2. Архив номеров
  3. Вестник науки №1 (1)
  4. Научная статья № 6

Просмотры  63 просмотров

Dzhura S.G., ChursinovV.I., Yakimishina V.V.  

Creativity philosophy in the consciousness impersonal theory  

The article covers several problems: philosophical understanding of a creativity problem in human’s consciousness different states (wakefulness, sleeping, consciousness changed states, consciousness deviant states, different types of a trance, etc.). An attempt to explain the creativity phenomena by the universe modern polarization theory, the hyperbolic field concept, quantum physics, the universe multidimensional theory, the string theory, artificial intelligence and anthropo-space gnosis and also by the complex variable mathematical theories and the centaur theories is made. The synthetic approach to the reality understanding is reasoned. The forecast of possible ways of development of humanity in case of acceptance of this or that coordinated position based on the reality ontological and semantic structure is made. Such prospects as transhumanism, the classical biological approach, consciousness independence, and field and ray forms of matter are examined.   

Ключевые слова:
the universe polarization theory, quantum physics, the universe multidimensional theory, the string theory, anthropo-space gnosis, trans-humanism, the reality ontological and semantic structure, the complex variable theory and the centaur theory.   

A talent reaches the goal that no one can reach;

A genius reaches the goal that no one can see.

(Arthur Schopenhauer)


Creativity is one of the most mysterious phenomena in a human’s life. The paper makes an attempt to reveal the mystery, and namely to examine the highest (philosophical) level of understanding of the phenomenon from the point of view of the inter-disciplinary system approach. We offer to examine the creativity main problem (as we see it) which is the creativity type. It is not a secret that the creativity can be both constructive and destructive (both for the society and an individual). The research hypothesis is the assumption that comprehensive studying of the phenomenon can reveal its rational explanation mechanism although the irrational component is still of importance which cannot be ignored. The topicality of this philosophical understanding of the creativity problem can be easily proved by the speech of the President of the RF Mr. V.V. Putin at the Festival of Youth and Students on October 21st 2017 [1] in which he suggested three postulates: “…I would like to start with a very simple thing: 1. These grand creative plans, if they are not in the sphere of a fundamental science, are to be applied. They are to be workable in terms of not only tomorrow or the next day, but also in terms of the current day…; 2. Education is the key point…; It is mastering of Soft-Skills…; The second point is skill development: communication skills, ability to control your emotions and work in a team…; 3. The third point is very important to all of us irrespective of what we do or will do in the future. Do you know what it is? It is a moral and ethical component of any business! ...; …When we do something, I repeat, we must never forget about the moral and ethical basis of our business. All we do is to be to people’s good, is to strengthen a person, but not to destroy him” [1]. The leader of the Big Russian World oriented the young generation to their future creativity which is to be for the benefit of people, education and peace all over the world. Thus, the topicality of the task is doubtless: creativity which moves up (constructive) and down (destructive) will lead the individual and his environment. Our book [2], which was noted in the DPR, Germany, and Russia [3] in 2017, covers the moral and ethical aspect. The portal “Business Donbass” published reportage about it [4]. All which is new is known to be the well forgotten old. We have not been the first to discuss creativity from this viewpoint. The author of the fundamental paper [5] following the ideas of another outstanding Russian philosopher [6] makes an attempt to justify human’s creativity for the benefit of the mankind and evolution. There is one question to answer: what does the benefit mean and why does the good have to make excuses all the time? How can we measure the benefit? Is it possible to do? The questions are not rhetorical at all. Mr. Nikolay Berdyaev criticizes the traditional morality of the Christian world which he thinks is not creative [7]. He suggests an argument that all which is new comes to the world as nonsense and leaves it as a dogma. It is the dogmatic traditional Christian morality which doesn’t give the way to the creativity. On the other hand the book makes Mr. Berdyaev’s dream a reality: “The new philosophy dream is to become a scientific one. Nobody of recognized philosophers doubts the correctness and legality of the desire to by all means turn philosophy into a scientific discipline [8]”. In this paper we leave aside the discussion on dynamics of development of the religious world outlook of the system “The Old Testament - The New Testament- the Latest Testament” as it is a separate thing to discuss [9]. The creativity is known to be examined not only as a process of creation of something new, but also as the process taking place under the interaction of a person (or human’s inner world) and the reality (what it means is still under discussion). That is why the concept of creativity is the linking component in the system “an individual- consciousness- the nature”. We will examine the concept within the system. Changes take place not only in the reality but also in the individual. We will use the system dialectic approach in the paper. It is a separate question what the reality is. There is a question raised in the philosophical paradigm of the universal monism: “Are you aware of the space?” [10] We think the reality is a multidimensional hierarchic structure with the following gradation (bottom up): 1) noise, 2) data (which can be measured), 3) information (classified data), 4) knowledge (data and laws of the data functioning), 5) wisdom (reflection of the Absolute or the Truth, or God in religious coordinates), 6) Absolute (God, the Truth) [11]. Thus, the creativity is a result of the interaction of the subject and the object through a mysterious subject which is consciousness. The concept linguistic analysis leads to the following analogy: consonance (a joint sound), cooperation (joint work), and consciousness (joint knowledge). So, it is producing of the joint knowledge through the creativity. Let us examine the concept of the creativity in the light of consciousness modern theories. The range is from a consciousness cognitive and symbolic analysis [12] to the consciousness impersonal theory [13]. We like the approach of the author of [12]: “Philosophy differs from other spheres of human culture by the fact that it allows speaking about the outrageous things and covering the problems which other disciplines will never examine”. We will try to follow the lofty idea in our research. Like the author [12] we understand that the way we have chosen is not easy at all. “That is why I am trying to examine the issues though it is clear to me that my position is vulnerable” [12]. The oriental ethical gnosis recommends keeping the consciousness open, so does the consciousness modern theory: “The fauna demonstrates a huge variety of the forms of perception and feeling which have not been known to us before. Even though the human does not have many of them, their existence is possible in principle. The fact that modern science does not understand the way they are organized and function does not discredit them and is not the reason to reject them” [12]. We will try to expand the sphere of scientific understanding of the phenomenon. Mr. N. Tinbergen says [12]: “This so-called extrasensory (supersensory) perception is an unclear phenomenon because of many reasons and, first of all, because of a vague terminology. If a sense organ is defined as something which delivers information about the environment to an animal, there is no supersensory perception at all. On the other hand, if the term is applied to some unknown processes, we should say about wide spread of the extrasensory perception among living beings. In fact the echolocation night bats have, fish lateral line functions and the way electric fish find their prey are based on the processes we did not know about and thus were supersensory 25 years ago” [12]. “The world human comes across in his everyday life is known to be the world of average dimensions. The human’s sense organs are consequently adapted to perception of these very ranges. Thus, he sees within the interval between ultra-violet and ultra-red radiation. Bees, for example, have their ability to percept in the ultraviolet range (that is why the human and the bee see a flower differently). This allows them finding nectar easily. But they are unable to distinguish between a red and a black flower” [12]. We have already reasoned the human’s creativity hypothesis [4] the key message of which is that the human is an antenna with its nerve centres (plexus in oriental philosophy) oriented to the nature. It exchanges information with the space data base (in scientific terminology) or God (in a religious and philosophical coordinate system) through psychic energy (energy and information influence or consciousness in other coordinates). Prof. V.V. Puck [5] (the Department of Mathematics of Donetsk National Technical University, our alma mater, was named after him)said about it many times. The thesis supports the ideas of an outstanding neurophysiologist academician of the RAS N. P. Bekhtereva: “I assume that a thought exists separately from brain and the latter catches it from the space and reads. There is much we see but cannot explain” [16] and the concept of the best ever electrical engineer Nikola Tesla: “My brain is a receiving device. There is a nucleus in the space out of which we get knowledge, power and inspiration. I haven’t revealed the nucleus mysteries, but I know for sure it exists” [17]. We can suppose that other genii of the mankind worked according to the scheme (though not always). For example, A.S. Pushkin was inspired in Boldino village (in modern terminology there was a coverage zone of the World Communication Statement). Richard Bach started writing his great book “Jonathan Livingston Seagull” and then the connection broke and he could do nothing about it. It was only after the period of many years that he was able to finish it in the same great manner. Any type of creativity (dancing, music, painting, cinema, research etc) is to be tuned up to some Eternity wave and might have some divine nature (if the genius is inspired by something). The method does not have either a mathematical proof (induction) or a deductive conclusion. Even basic theorems of linear algebra cannot be proved without the induction. Paper [18] covered the issues of logic system development and its incompleteness in details. Anthropocosmism consciousness ontology describes the approach based on the following basic ideas: the universal monism, dialectics, consciousness fine substance nature, consciousness energy nature, relative potential mentalism as the universality of archetype of the great consciousness in the space totality and, possibly, consciousness relative functionalism [19]. The analysis of the doctrine texts did not let the author [19] make the definite conclusion as to the functionalism. However, he thinks that some elements of functionalistic interpretation of the consciousness essence are present in a non-developed form in theosophy and Agni Yoga. The theosophical theory about coatings (Russian dolls like) or the so called “consciousness principles” (the “consciousness principles” is a theosophical term related with the multidimensional nature of human’s consciousness in the ontological structure of the micro space) speaks in favour of this point of view. According to the theory the consciousness can functionally be displayed in all ontological plans or levels of the space being through different bodies (coats or carriers) – a physical body, an astral body, and a mental body. While explaining the issue Mrs. E.P. Blavatskaya stated: “A numen (the consciousness – intellect) can be a phenomenon on any existence plan being displayed through the relevant basis or the explorer” [20]. Therefore we can drive to a conclusion that the brain is not the only consciousness explorer and the exceptional organ. The consciousness can act outside somatic capsulation and neurophysiologic dependence on the brain. This suggests that the consciousness is functional, and is some spiritual or energy characteristic able to be manifested in the nature alternatively and as a substrate. While interpreting the consciousness as a monad accumulated psychic and energy potential anthropocosmists do not support the idea of physiological reductions and state that the consciousness and the psychic reality are ontologically multidimensional. Taking into account the tendencies of development of natural science in the end of the XX and beginning of the XXI centuries the philosophical position does not look like free speculation anymore and gains certain theoretical and empiric basis [19]. The war of the New Time against obsolete metaphysics seems to have been over successfully in the XIX century. But everything turned out to be not as it had been expected. The war results rocked the basics of the ordinary consciousness and scientific mind! The reduced to dust esoteric metaphysics were exposed to reincarnation in generally recognized scientific doctrines. Academic science started reproducing the truth of mystical doctrines of the past through the mouths of its best representatives. The Nobel Prize winners in physics started proving totally seditious from the point of view of classical science and crazy from the point of view of common sense ideas: all fundamental particles are none other than structuralized and vibrating space – physical vacuum. To put it in simpler words, the total world is built out of the space vacuum. People in Europe were looking for the inviolable blocks of the universe – Democritus’ eternal atoms- for many thousands of years. They found the horrible Great Nothing of overthrown metaphysical systems instead. It is the irony of the evolution of the learning mind – the mysticism is tasted much brighter in modern physical theories than in some religious doctrines [13]. We support the approach of the author [12] who explains the Absolute vibration scheme: “The world a human comes across in his everyday life is the world of average dimensions. Human’s sensors are, correspondingly, adapted to perceive these very ranges. Thus, he sees within the interval between ultraviolet and ultra-red rays. However, bees have the ability to perceive in the ultraviolet light (that is why bees and the human see a flower differently) and can easily find nectar. But a red and a black flower are indistinguishable for them”. The philosophical approach fully correlates with conclusions of our paper [12] in which the hypothesis of the mysterious reality is represented as the Absolute vibration schemes. It can be displayed symbolically as a famous emblem of N.K. Roerich (three red circles in the red ring on the white cloth) recognized by the UNO as a sign of protection of cultural values. If, according to the scheme, all the vibrations are divided into three parts, the vibration lowest group (represented by the first out of three circles) is personified as the academician V.I. Vernadski (classical physics), the next middle vibration group (and the corresponding second circle of Roerich’s emblem) is personified as Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (Metaphysics), and the scheme and the third circle of Roerich’s emblem (the highest group of Absolute vibrations) is closed by Édouard Louis Emmanuel Julien Le Roy (hyper physics as a matter of facts). The circles cover the eternity ring (vibration infinity) that is all things in existence. Thus the analysis of the mysterious reality around us can be represented symbolically. The red colour symbolizes the opposite thinking process which is the knowledge synthesis Patriarch Kirill dreams about: “Saint Fathers combined secular scholarship and theology and formed a synthesis. The famous theologian archpriest Georgy Florovski named it the patristic synthesis. He wanted the current generation of theologians to combine the secular culture with theological creativity for the latter to be able to enrich the culture and to make words of the Church topical. I pray and hope for the dream of father Georgy Florovski to become a reality at present” [22]. It is no coincidence that we cited the words of the religious thinker. The religious approach alongside with the traditional scientific one can personify Meta physics in our scheme which is outside the limits of classical physics (according to Aristotle). And it really is like that! Meta knowledge (as it is called in the western philosophical thought) or ethical gnosis (as it is called in the east) can personify the hyper physics in our scheme. It consists of the following triad: Agni Yoga, THE, and theosophy. The concepts analysis is outside the scope of our research though, from our point of view, it is rather promising. The thesis of esoteric doctrines (ethical gnosis) to have been reincarnated is proved by the works of the Noble Prize winners, L.D. landau being among them. There are three types of science in his science classification: “natural science, unnatural science and supernatural science” [23]. He might have spoken about natural science, humanities and Meta science in present understanding of the classification (that is about Meta history and Meta-physics which is outside the limits of the present one). The main thing is that the point of view can be rationally explained today and the ternary theories can be developed in physics, philosophy and mathematics. Let us start with physics. The world new physical picture [24] shows that to solve physical problems of the origin of life suggested by the academician V.L. Ginzburg (irreducibility or reduction of the living to nonliving, for example) it is impossible to apply elementary particle physics only. The sphere of research is to be extended to the fields of the Universe which are not, as a rule, within the traditional scientific paradigm. These are the fields which religion and esoteric have been studying for many centuries by their own means. It was done in paper [25]. The author of the paper made an attempt to unite three worlds we spoke about above on the basis of the following constants: Planck’s constant (h-worlds), light speed (C-worlds) and the gravitation acceleration constant (G-worlds). All of them are possible in the endless world of the scalar field (the one which does not have spin rotation). The field nature is there. It is the field world in which there is no substance. The worlds of the type differ by the wave velocity (C-worlds). The space of the worlds of the second type has axial symmetry which makes rotation possible. These worlds appear in the C-worlds in the form of inclusions (the universes). The wave vibrations are polarized into two reverse rotating swirls there. It results in formation of substance rotating particles and quantum fields. These universes are characterized by a new constant – in our Universe it is Planck’s constant h. They are h-universes. New physical quantities such as mass, impulse, energy, moment of momentum and spin appear in the worlds, and the particles have varying rest mass. The third type of the worlds has the space central symmetry and comes into being in the form of inclusions in huniverses. Unlike the two first world types where time is reversible, gravitation occurs here. It is characterized by the gravitation acceleration constant G which causes time irreversibility in some particles, nucleons in particular, which the familiar to us world consists of. The effect is very weak and cannot be tested in modern experiments. However it is a significant as it makes evolution irreversible. All three space symmetries are realized in the gravitating relativistic world which science studies. The particles have fixed characteristics including rest mass here. Physicists see that the number of particles is changed, but nobody has been able to observe the elementary particle appearance and their characteristic forming so far although it does take place somewhere. This means that there is the world where they appear and which is inaccessible for the physical experiment. This happens in the polarized world: not only space-time coordinates but also fields, particles and structures are created there out of the substance formed by the nucleons. The picture of the universe three worlds is close to the Vedic (esoteric) concept where the highest world – the world of the Spirit- gives birth to the universe two types. The first one can be compared to the huniverses has no reproduction. It appears in the universe second type. According to the universe polarization.



Полная версия статьи PDF

Номер журнала Вестник науки №1 (1)   

Ссылка для цитирования:

Dzhura S.G., ChursinovV.I., Yakimishina V.V. Creativity philosophy in the consciousness impersonal theory // Вестник науки №1 (1). С. 38 - 47. 2018 г. ISSN 2712-8849 // Электронный ресурс: https://www.вестник-науки.рф/article/6 (дата обращения: 07.08.2022 г.)

Нашли грубую ошибку (плагиат, фальсифицированные данные или иные нарушения научно-издательской этики) ?
- напишите письмо в редакцию журнала:

© 2018